Showing posts with label philosophical rail defender. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophical rail defender. Show all posts

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Open Positions

Currently, we have on a few positions that I'd like to note as some are now gaining traction and others are languishing in the depths

All in the EuroDollar Complex: {#GE_f}

9912.5 Straddle in March 2014
  • Last post I mentioned that we were long the green March {2014} 9912.5 straddle. We originally initiated this trade when it was very close to ATM {vs. 9913.5}. Our thought process was that we might be able to get a run up, or down, in the greens and we would then have a chance to scalp the gamma. As it turned out, we bounced up to 9927 and as a result, we sold deltas the entire way up. Now the greens are starting to pull back while the euphoria of a stalling 3-month LIBOR is beginning to wain and it's time to do an inventory of where we're at:
  • Hedges: We sold deltas at 14, 16, 19.5, 22, and 24 {equally} for an average short of ~9919
  • As we approach that level again, we'll be looking to buy back some of these higher sales and to subsequently place GTC's to the upside.
 9900-9937.5 Put Spread in June 2012
  • We bought this purely as an insurance policy against Europe. Our entry level was 3.5 ticks vs 9948 in the June '12 futures. Locals had a 22 delta on it at the time of execution.
  • Our thought process was two fold: Cheap-ish price for a 10:1 payout and we've noticed that as the time passes and/or we drift higher, this type of structure actually ages very well {code for it doesn't lose its value instantly}
  • Since we're using this as a macro hedge to our book, we didn't execute any deltas vs 9948. Our first buy will be ~9943.5 but, we intend on keeping it significantly under hedged so as to fully capture any type of front-end credit event. {Greeks missing their end of March bond payment?}
 Just a peak at what we like. I think you're able to still execute both of these strategies relatively close to the our levels if you're so inclined. Obviously, we have others and my hope is to write about a few of our futures plays tomorrow.

A bit of housekeeping. The Philosophical Rail Defender has requested a name change. I guess that since he's no longer on the floor, it no longer makes sense to think of him on the rail...who knew? At any rate, I've added him as an author on here under the acronym EDUB. Maybe it sticks.

~LH

Friday, January 13, 2012

Churning a Friday the 13th


Happy Friday the 13th! Here's a few observations from the last week of trade. 

Over the past few sessions the White Pak in the EuroDollars has been on a tear. Since 01.05.12 they have bolting higher. The most obvious correlation has been the recent down ticking in LIBOR, which has moved from .58250% to its current level of .56700%. {a net change of -.0155} After relentlessly charging higher {or grinding to a halt only to uptick again} it has been steadily reversing. Helped by relatively positive auctions in Spain and Italy, the big boy banks have been easing a bit and thus we've downticked. However, with the rumored downgrades of Austria and France today, the EuroDollar futures have pulled off of the uber highs and are sitting still, just a touch below last night’s settles {future's prices}.
It is interesting to note a few highs/lows:
  • Though LIBOR is currently printing only .567% the White Pak had an implied rate of .480% early Friday morning.
  • Post downgrade rumors, they had repriced to ~.550% much closer to the .567% LIBOR print.
  • The curve began to flatten again today with the back months steadily gaining in price.
Trades to have on:
We're currently keeping it pretty tight. Day trading the front quarterly spreads in the ED as well as some of the more stable 1x2 butterflies. 
  • We have a core position of short the June/Sept/Dec butterfly in the ED's. We initiated this at a price of 1.5 ticks. It has been as low as .5 and briefly traded 2.
  • We think that some of the 2013-2014-2015 1 year butterflies are starting to look really attractive. On a daily chart, many are breaching their 2 standard deviation levels {Bollinger bands}We're looking to establish a few longs in this area.
  • We are currently long Green March 9912.5 {2014} straddles in the EuroDollar.
  • Our Fed Funds book is currently long spreads, though in terms of size, we're on the lighter side of things.
Euro Currency {courtesy of PrD}
An interesting trade to look at is long the Euro FX.  Yeah, yeah, I know Europe is burning, and the Euro is surely headed for $1.20 at the very least and perhaps even par.  Well, guess what the crowd is thinking the same thing as net long positions declined by 24% over the past week, while net short positions increased by 29% in the same period, leaving the long to short ratio at 1.06, or roughly 51% long.  This is a HUGE shift in sentiment, warranted or not, when a trade gets too one sided, we all know what comes next, think of gold and silver in the fall.

Look at oil in the last week, everyone was long because they just knew that sanctions were going to be imposed on Iran and this would drive the cost WAY up, maybe as high as $150. Cooler heads prevailed and the market tanked $5 in two trading sessions.  This is what happens when the crowd thinks they are holding a sure thing and are going to get something for nothing.  Ever notice that the more hysterical the market gets the more people climb on board, throwing all caution to the wind and buy higher and higher prices, or vice versa?  

My question for all those piling into a short Euro trade right now is, where were was you in October when the Euro was at $1.40?  Wouldn’t it have made a lot more sense to get short then?  That play would have required a little forethought and time spent in research.  In my opinion, the Euro began its decline over 3 months ago because the smart investors did their due diligence and bet accordingly. 

The fact is this; the ECB just gave European banks the lifeline they desperately needed with the LTRO, almost 500 billion Euros for 3 years at 1%.  Accordingly, the basis rate swap has headed south as it should.  This development should signal that one should be closing out short positions, not adding to them.  There is a great possibility of a MASSIVE short squeeze.   Such a move could launch the Euro back up to $1.35 or higher.  For this reason, I recommend scooping up a lottery ticket to fade the herd mentality.  The March $1.35 call can be purchased for 30 pips, or $375 bucks per one lot, with over 50 days to expiration, this is a trade you can’t afford to not take.  If it doesn’t work out, no big deal, but I would imagine an outright short Euro position is going to expose your account to a much bigger loss than $375.  Happy hunting!

Enjoy the long weekend with people that matter
~LH

Friday, January 6, 2012

2012 Predicitions

Everybody is doing it these days, why not throw my hat into the ring. Besides, its always fun to be ridiculously wrong and subsequently mocked.

I'll focus on the areas where we actually trade, work, and enjoy.

Left Hash's Calls for 2012


Fed Funds: 
I think Ben and his gang have sufficiently squashed any hope of a rate hike for all of 2012. Their language at the last FOMC meeting even hinted at further QE, which in my opinion, is an even bigger mess than the one he's trying to solve. The funds rates have been settling around 7-9 bps for a while now and though the market and its participants don't really like this level, I don't foresee it moving more than 4-5 bps {and the only direction is lower}. I am comfortable selling the 1 year 87-93 strangle strip at 39.5 {1.5.12 settlement prices + some modeled data}. Any premium collected with cover you in the rare event that we actually move. Additionally, I believe that our model will create a lot more opportunities to trade if we do head lower and spreads start expanding. I firmly believe, a settle outside of that strangle has about a 15 delta. 

ED: 
I don't believe LIBOR will stay here for the year. I believe that the European banking/sovereign debt crisis has 'mostly' blown over and we'll begin to see a return to cheaper money. If Ben and company do initiate some type of QE3, I don't think its out of the realm of possibilities to see the 97 line come back into play across the whites. However, I would wager that for the most part, you'll see LIBOR average around 40-45 bps for the year with an occasional dip down into the 50-55 range. I would buy put spreads to take advantage of extremely rich put skew and to hedge some of the event exposure {9925-9900 or similar}Buying calls on the grind higher also would be prudent, as they somehow 'decay' on an uptick in the futures. It will be interesting to see if the Fed Funds vs Eurodollar correlation comes back into line as 2013 {and raising rates} looms. 

SPX: 
I don't really trade equity futures except to speculate. My one year target is 1405. The range will be 1080-1465. Drifting lower at the end of Q1 will bring about some type of QE3 and rally the equities into the 1400 range. A long grind for the summer months, followed by a slight pull back into year's end for a gorgeous print of 1405. Buy ES puts when the VIX is below 20, sell everything you can if it spikes above 40. 

Yield Curve: 
The Tens will print 1.50% and the Bond will touch 2.40% and because neither is good for anyone but giant banks, they will snap back and settle at 2.25% and 3.50%. The locals still have the front skews to the calls {implying that in the near term, the traders feel we'll trend higher and therefor pay a premium for that protection versus the puts} However, if you look 6 months out that trend levels out and 9 months out, it has actually shifted towards the puts {implying lower price and higher yields}. I wouldn't be afraid to buy puts and sell calls up to 3 months out. 

Gold: 
 Currently $1600 
2012's high: $1872 
2012's low: $1344 
 Settle: $1440 

Crude: 
Currently $101 
2012's high: $114 
 2012's low: $82 
Settle: $88 

 EuroCurrency: 
Currently $1.2725 
2012's high: $1.3630 
2012's low: $1.2200 
Settle: $1.3150 ______________________________________________________________________ 

Never to be out done, my colleague, Mr. PrD {Philosophical Rail Defender} has offered a quick glimpse at what he believes will be our 2012. 

Mr. PrD's Calls for 2012 


Overall, I think 2012 will have a periods of reflationary hopes, dashed by deflationary fears, much like 2011. Much will be dependent upon further increases in central bank balance sheets. However, I predict that the half-life of any such increases will be increasingly shorter and shorter. My advice for the year is not marry any one idea, keep an open mind (don't fall into the trap of extreme sentiment accompanied with herd psychology), and understand that we live in exponential times. 

That being said, the predictions are: 
S&P 
High:1320-1350 
 Low: 950-980 

Oil 
High:110-112 
Low: 65-68 

Gold 
High:1850 
Low:1400 

30 Year yields 
High: 3.75 
Low: 2.40 

Euro currency 
High: 1.3400 
Low: 1.1800 

Hope we all make a ton of money this year. 

~LH

Thursday, October 7, 2010

Dialog of the Practical Thinker

A friend of ours recently sent me my first ever 6 page text message. In it, he was describing a conversation that he'd been wrestling with. Rather than summarize it, I think it would be best to put it up in it entirety so that the conversation can be correctly formed.

From the Philosophical Rail Defender (PrD):

I find myself asking the same question over and over. If globalization was the agreed upon mechanism to lead the undeveloped nations of the world forward and capital is finite, doesn't such forward progress require the developed nations of the world to give up a portion of their piece of the resource pie? 

More importantly, depending upon your answer, I'm also curious as to why the "richest", "most developed" nations are also those with the most debt (both public and private)? And, in the event of a large scale shift of resources between sovereigns, what would one expect to happen to the cash flow of said nations' debentures? 


I eagerly await your response. I suspect that the connotations our society has attached to "globalization" will present you with a unique challenge to weigh the working pieces of the process against the stratified public opinion of the subject. Will you be called a pragmatist or a protectionist, a capitalist or a fascist? I suppose it depends on how many people it reaches.

As these questions filtered in {through 6 text messages} I tried to identify the thrust of his real questions. I firmly believe that in order to formulate an answer, you need to know what is being asked. Though I have great respect the art of debate, I'll be the first to tell you that it isn't a defining factor in who I am. {The situation changes only slightly when I'm trying to convince you of a trade idea. However, I am surrounded by some individuals that have often put my intellectual prowess to shame. So in a brazen attempt to harness their collective genius, I asked my colleague, Mr. Practical Thinker, to expound on his views as the pertain to PrD's question(s). His response {as I would have predicted} is nothing short of exquisite.

From the pen of Mr. Practical Thinker:


Those are some serious questions to be sure. So much so, I've had to break them down to their elements in an attempt to answer. To begin, I'm not so sure there's a global consensus on how to move the undeveloped nations forward. I remember a fun factoid in the CFA curriculum (sorry no citation) about emerging markets and the global balance of GDP. We all know global GDP should grow significantly in the next 30-50 years but the tiny little secret no one wants to admit is the vast majority of that growth will be attributed to the strengthening currencies of those emerging markets. If you've grabbed a newspaper lately, you'll more than likely recognize that currency issues are grabbing the headlines almost everyday. Brazil's Finance Minister thinks we're at war over them! Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Switzerland, the UK, the EU, and the US have all intervened in their currency markets explicitly or implicitly (QE is a stealth intervention in my book and buying member sovereigns isn't behavior for sainthood either). China's currency policy is fodder for the front page daily. Even if they are cheating (read: artificially weak yuan), they're sure as hell treating it like war.

Secondly, I'm not sure capital is finite. Even in the context of the Austrian gold standard, there's still a mechanism for capital formation through gold discovery. Fiat systems lack a considerable morality comparatively and capital is still up for a proper definition (tongue firmly in cheek).

So do we need to give up some of the resource pie? If the Chinese are going to play like that, we do. Global wage arbitrage has sure been a loser in developed countries and is getting difficult to swallow politically. Without aggregate demand reallocation in emerging markets, it will not get better any time soon.    

Why do developed nations have the most debt? I'm twisted between the chicken or the egg axiom and cultural progression on that one. What came first, big buildings or big loans? Probably the legal construct to secure property and intellectual rights and the sacrosanct structure of corporate limited liability. Once those are in place, a responsible banking culture should grow out of diligent risk management. Check India for horror stories on what happens if those events happen out of order. 

Lastly, how will a large scale shift of resources between sovereigns affect cash flows? Depends on the dynamics of the sovereign in question. If it was a developed economy, hopefully Say's Law would take care of them. If the country was mired in debt (the leftovers of credit, a once valuable resource laid waste) and couldn't pull the appropriate levers (read above) to squeak out alive, then just pay attention to Ireland as the ending to that tragedy is being written. 


Mr. Practical Thinker

Suffice to say, his deconstruction of the questions led to his ability to reconstruct an answer. Hopefully, that will satisfy PrD's questions. I'll close with this: Self awareness is paramount to crafting great decisions. In the same token I find it refreshing that Mr. PT has stayed out of the altruistic box while adding dialog to the attempted repair of global economic policy.

~LH